- Evidence class
- Clone-kit storefront · .shop clone kit
- Observed state
- live, HTTP 200 when checked on 27 October 2026
- Last observed serving
- 27 October 2026 — the date the artefacts below belong to
- First documented
- 2026-07-27
- Decay history (9 superseded observations)
- live, HTTP 200 on 2 September 2026
- live, HTTP 200 on 8 September 2026
- live, HTTP 200 on 15 September 2026
- live, HTTP 200 on 22 September 2026
- resolves but not serving — HTTP 502 on 29 September 2026
- live, HTTP 200 on 13 October 2026
- live, HTTP 200 on 18 October 2026
- live, HTTP 200 on 19 October 2026
- live, HTTP 200 on 20 October 2026
- Artefacts we published (0)
- None recorded for this hostname beyond the finding itself. We state that rather than padding the row.
Brand clone report — every hostname on one page
Luxe Bites fake stores: every hostname we have documented
We have documented 1 lookalike hostname reproducing Luxe Bites. Every one is below with the evidence class it rests on, the state we observed in our fixed vocabulary, the date we observed it, and every earlier observation still on the record. Most recent check: 27 October 2026.
Of the 1 documented hostname copying Luxe Bites: 1 was live, HTTP 200 when we last checked. A hostname's state can change on any day, in either direction — one row on this list was observed “does not resolve” on 31 July 2026 and “live, HTTP 200” again on 2 September 2026, re-confirmed 8 September 2026, 15 September 2026, 22 September 2026, 13 October 2026, 18 October 2026, 19 October 2026, 20 October 2026 and 27 October 2026.
Free research · priced actions
Is your brand in this corpus? Check the name.
This research is free. 61 documented lookalike storefront hostnames across 57 brands, carrying 653 dated observations between them, all re-checked in our re-verification round of 27 October 2026. Type a brand name or a domain below: if we have documented it, that brand's own rows and every dated reading on them come back here, and you can act on them. If we have not, the free pass on your own domain is one click away.
A brand name (“Kyte Baby”), your own domain, or a lookalike hostname you were sent — any of the three resolves to the brand it reproduces.
Luxe Bites — 1 documented hostname, with every dated observation
10 dated observations on this brand’s rows, the earliest documented 27 July 2026, the most recent completed reading 27 October 2026. Of that hostname: 1 live, HTTP 200 at their last check; 0 do not resolve; 0 resolve but did not serve the page; 0 we could not re-check, because our own check failed.
Every row below is already published free on its own page, and each one links to it. The state is the most recent completed observation and the day it was taken; the chain under it is every dated reading on that row, oldest first, including the ones later rounds superseded. Nothing here says what any hostname is serving today.
2 September 2026 — live, HTTP 2008 September 2026 — live, HTTP 20015 September 2026 — live, HTTP 20022 September 2026 — live, HTTP 20029 September 2026 — resolves but not serving — HTTP 50213 October 2026 — live, HTTP 20018 October 2026 — live, HTTP 20019 October 2026 — live, HTTP 20020 October 2026 — live, HTTP 20027 October 2026 — live, HTTP 200
The whole free record for Luxe Bites — the registry read-backs we hold, the rows that changed on the most recent round, and the method — is on its own page. The full record for Luxe Bites→
Run the same checks on a domain you own
The rows above are what we have already published. The actions below run the same checks on a domain YOU own — never on a hostname from this corpus, and never on a domain we guessed for you.
We hold no verified domain for Luxe Bites in our own register, so the field below is empty rather than guessed: a documented lookalike never tells us what the real brand owns, and an audit run against a guessed address is a wrong report somebody paid for. Type the domain you own.
Same engine, same method, same claims — run deeper. The Brand Impersonation Audit documents up to 15 confirmed hostnames and reports the rest of what resolved as a count; the Documented Evidence Dossier documents up to 30 of them row by row, from a candidate list of up to 320 names rather than 180. Nothing is added to a row and no caveat is softened. If a capped pass over your own domain answers your question, buy the $29 audit instead — this tier is for a file complete enough to hand to someone else.
The card form opens on this page, and nothing is charged until you complete it. Both are single charges — no account, no subscription, nothing kept on file. See a real report before you buy — one complete Brand Impersonation Audit, published in full.
This is not a different or deeper method. One domain is the $29 Brand Impersonation Audit and you should buy that instead; the $249 buys the same audit across a portfolio in one checkout and one combined dated report.
No card? Buy it on an invoice instead
Request an invoice for the Documented Evidence Dossier — $149
Most brand-protection, trademark and legal teams cannot put a company card through a supplier's web form — spend leaves as an invoice, often against a purchase order. If that is you, ask for one here instead.
Tell us who to invoice and which domains the audit covers. We email you a confirmation immediately and send the invoice to the same address. The report is produced once the invoice is paid.
Free · CC BY 4.0
Free, and staying free
- Every row of this corpus is published under CC BY 4.0 — all 61 hostnames across 57 brands, with all 653 dated observations, including every superseded reading.
- You may copy, re-publish, chart and adapt it, including commercially. Attribution is the single condition, and it is defined rather than implied.
- The same records are downloadable as a CSV, a JSON release and a plain-text release from /lookalike-domain-dataset, plus one free page per hostname and one per brand. Nothing is held back from them.
- No email, no account and no card is needed for any of that, and none of it expires.
CSV · JSON · Plain text · the records themselves
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Attribution under this licence means two things together: a text credit naming Scam Detective, and a crawlable link to the canonical URL https://scam-detective8.acoco.ai/lookalike-domain-dataset. A link carrying rel="nofollow" or rel="sponsored" does not satisfy it.
$499 one-time
$499 one-time — the same corpus, delivered as a file
- A CSV of the whole corpus, one row per documented hostname — all 61 of them across 57 brands — in the evidence-class shape, with the artefacts we published quoted verbatim.
- The full dated observation history: all 653 observations we hold, every superseded reading kept with its own date on the row it belongs to, oldest first.
- The same table as a paginated PDF, with the dated summary and the limits on the front of it.
- Delivered by email the moment the payment verifies: the link to your order page is emailed to you and both files sit on that page. No account to create, nothing kept on file.
- An invoice or PO route beside the card form, for a procurement team that cannot put a company card through a supplier's form — the export is produced once that invoice is paid. $499 is a single charge either way.
$499 does not buy permission, access or exclusivity, and nobody loses anything because you bought it: the rows stay free under CC BY 4.0 at /lookalike-domain-dataset, including for commercial use. What it buys is the delivered artefact — the whole corpus as one dated file, fixed to the day you pay — and its delivery.
Not included, in plain words
- No monitoring. We do not watch these hostnames for you after delivery, and nothing in the file is re-checked on your behalf.
- No feed and no API. There is no endpoint, no webhook, no push and no alerting — this is one file, bought once.
- No ongoing updates. The export is fixed to the day it was produced. A later re-verification round does not update your copy, and buying this does not entitle you to the next one.
- No registrar, hosting provider, network, name server or IP, for any hostname. That attribution is withheld here exactly as it is on every free page of this site.
- No takedown, no filing, no outcome and no timing of any kind — this is a record of what we observed, not an action taken against anyone.
These are not sentences written for this page. They are the scope limits from our own claims register, reproduced word for word, and they bind every surface of this site — including the one you are reading.
- Every report is a point-in-time audit of publicly observable information, dated to the day the reads were taken. A hostname's state can change at any time after that date.
- No continuous monitoring, on any tier. There is no real-time feed, no API and no alerting, and nothing is re-checked after the report is delivered.
- No takedown execution, on any tier: we never file. We assemble the evidence and draft the request; the buyer sends it.
- We never contact the registrant, and we do not contact a registrar, host or platform on a customer's behalf.
- No outcome and no timeline is promised. Whether anything is suspended is the registrar's, host's or platform's decision alone.
- No legal representation, ever. This is the boundary that did NOT move and must never be softened. We are not a law firm.
- No fund recovery.
- No legal proceedings, and no advice on the merits of a trademark position.
- We make no assertion about any registrant's intent or criminality
Quoted from growth/approved-claims.md §13b, with no word added, removed or softened — it binds the free rows above and every price on this page alike, at $29, at $149, at $249 and at $499: This is a point-in-time audit of publicly observable information, not legal advice and not monitoring. We assemble the evidence and draft the request; on this tier you send it. We do not file on your behalf, we do not contact the registrant, and no outcome or timeline is promised — that decision belongs to each registrar, host and platform.
And the same boundary on the $149 tier, in its own words: This is point-in-time documentation of publicly observable information, not monitoring and not legal advice. We document what our own code read on the day it read it, and we draft the request; on this tier you send it. We do not file on your behalf, we do not contact the registrant, we execute no takedown, and no outcome or timeline is promised — that decision belongs to each registrar, host and platform. We make no assertion about anyone's identity or intent, and a hostname's state can change at any time after the date on the file.
Questions before you pay, or a figure you want to check against the record: scam-detective8@mail.acoco.ai.
At a glance — 1 hostname
- luxebitesstore.shopClone-kit storefront · live, HTTP 200 when checked on 27 October 2026
1 of 1 was serving when we last checked it. A hostname's state can change on any day, in either direction — one row on this list was observed “does not resolve” on 31 July 2026 and “live, HTTP 200” again on 2 September 2026, re-confirmed 8 September 2026, 15 September 2026, 22 September 2026, 13 October 2026, 18 October 2026, 19 October 2026, 20 October 2026 and 27 October 2026.
Your brand · free counts first · $29 to reveal
How many lookalikes of your name are answering right now?
Free, no email and no card. Only hostnames we confirm resolving are counted as resolving — a name nobody has registered is counted, never padded into a list. How the names are generated and read.
No email, no card, no account. The sweep runs live and usually takes under a minute.
Know what you need already? The $29 report is right here. The $29 report names every hostname behind these counts, with the dated readings for each, the copying evidence where we found it, a risk rating derived in code, our own published record where we already hold one — and the takedown request drafted for you to send.
Everything the report contains, line by line — or read one complete $29 audit in full, nothing withheld, no email required.
What this is not: the Evidence Report is the researched tier — it adds the registrar and the true upstream host per domain, a filing drafted separately for every desk, and research beyond the patterns generated here. The audit is the deterministic sweep of your own name plus live reads, delivered without a research queue.
This is a point-in-time audit of publicly observable information, not legal advice and not monitoring. We assemble the evidence and draft the request; on this tier you send it. We do not file on your behalf, we do not contact the registrant, and no outcome or timeline is promised — that decision belongs to each registrar, host and platform.
Everything on this page is free to read, quote and take to a registrar, a marketplace or your own counsel. The audit above is the other question — what else is out there under your name that we have not documented — answered by a fresh sweep of your own domain, and one complete example is published in full.
The record: 1 documented hostname
Read each block as: the hostname we checked, the evidence class the finding rests on, the state we observed and the date we observed it, then every superseded observation and the artefacts we published, quoted exactly as we published them. Nothing here names a registrar, hosting provider, network or IP — that attribution is what the researched tiers are priced on, and it is withheld from every free page. We describe what each page serves; we make no assertion about any registrant’s intent or criminality, and nothing here is legal advice.
What a row looks like as data
Every row above is published in the structured form our own sweeps write it — the same fixed state vocabulary, the same dated columns. The complete column schema, one row per documented hostname and the downloadable releases exactly as delivered are on the dataset page, free to read, quote and take to a registrar, a marketplace or your own counsel.
The record as data — the column schema and every documented row →
What this page is, and what it is not
- It is a dated record. Every state above is what we observed on the day named beside it, in a fixed three-string vocabulary — nothing here is a statement about what any hostname is serving today, and we do not monitor these hostnames.
- A hostname that went quiet has not been shown to have come down. We did not observe why it stopped answering, we make no claim that anything was removed, suspended or taken down, and a hostname can be re-pointed on any day.
- It names no registrar, host, network or IP, and asserts nothing about any registrant's intent or about goods we have not examined.
- It promises no outcome. Nothing here predicts or promises a takedown, a filing result or a timescale, and nothing here is legal advice.
- Searches this page answers
- “Luxe Bites fake site” · “Luxe Bites clone store” · “Luxe Bites fake website list” · “Luxe Bites scam site” · “sites impersonating Luxe Bites”
Other brands on the record
Every brand we have documented is on the record. Brands whose file carries more than one hostname, a published artefact, a self-check or a change of state keep a page like this one; the rest are listed with the same dated rows on the index. If you act for more than one, start here:
Michael Angelo'sMicro KickboardMiss AmaraMoxie VinylsMUSASHINaturiumNest BeddingNOGUNomaticOnce Again Nut Butter
See every documented hostname, listed by the brand it copies — or jump straight to Luxe Bites' rows on the index. An index is a record of what we have checked, never a statement that nothing else exists.
If you have just found a copy of Luxe Bites's store: what to do first · did my takedown actually work? · the ten-second own-CDN check · why a free scanner and our own check read one hostname differently
Scam Detective — pay-per-use scam intelligence. One-off checks, no subscription, no account.
Every finding here is an assessment of publicly available information at the time of the check, and is not legal advice. We produce the evidence and the correctly addressed request, and we never file: on every tier the buyer sends it. We do not monitor continuously and never contact the registrant on a customer’s behalf, and no outcome or timeline is guaranteed. Confirm your own trademark position before sending anything adversarial. Each hostname above carries the date its own finding was captured; the most recent check on this brand ran on 27 October 2026.
Are you Luxe Bites, or do you act for them, and want a correction to any row above? scam-detective8@mail.acoco.ai