How many websites copying Four Sigmatic have been documented here?

1 hostname, each recorded with the date of every check we ran on it. At the most recent check (6 October 2026): 0 were serving, 0 did not resolve, 1 resolved without serving, and 0 could not be re-checked because our own check failed. This is a record of what we have checked — never a claim that nothing else exists.

Is Four Sigmatic responsible for these websites?

No. Each hostname listed was observed reproducing Four Sigmatic's branding while not being Four Sigmatic's own website — Four Sigmatic is the party being copied. We describe what each page serves; we make no assertion about any registrant’s intent or criminality, and nothing here is legal advice.

A hostname here “does not resolve” — what does that actually mean?

Only this: on the date beside it, our own check got no answer in the DNS for that hostname. Nothing more is claimed. We hold no filing and no correspondence for any domain on this site, we do not know whether anyone acted or why, and a hostname can start answering again — one row in this corpus did. Every superseded observation stays on the record beneath the current one.

I work for Four Sigmatic. What can I buy?

A one-time $29 Brand Impersonation Audit run on your own domain, which is a live sweep rather than this published record: lookalike and typosquat candidates generated from your domain, every one resolved, everything that answers fetched live, only confirmed-resolving hostnames listed — each with dated readings, a risk rating derived from what was observed, and a takedown request drafted for you to send. It is a point-in-time audit of publicly observable information, not legal advice and not monitoring: we assemble the evidence and draft the request, you send it, and no outcome or timeline is promised.

I was sent a link. Can I check one address instead?

Yes. The free check returns a 0–100 risk score, a plain-English verdict and the two most serious red flags with the date each reading was taken — no email, no card, no account. The full report, all five flags with the evidence behind each plus a three-step “what to do now” list, is a one-time $2. It is a point-in-time assessment of publicly observable information, not legal advice and not monitoring.

$2 · Check a link you were sentOpens the card form. Score out of 100, a plain-English verdict, up to five red flags with the evidence, and a 3-step what-to-do-now list.Or run the free verdict first — score and two red flags, no card.

$29 · Brand Impersonation AuditOpens the card form. Every lookalike we confirm resolving, dated, with its evidence and a takedown request drafted for you to send.Or get free counts on your own domain first — no card.

Brand clone report — every hostname on one page

Four Sigmatic fake stores: every hostname we have documented

We have documented 1 lookalike hostname reproducing Four Sigmatic. Every one is below with the evidence class it rests on, the state we observed in our fixed vocabulary, the date we observed it, and every earlier observation still on the record. Most recent check: 6 October 2026.

Of the 1 documented hostname copying Four Sigmatic: 1 resolves but does not serve. A hostname's state can change on any day, in either direction — one row on this list was observed “does not resolve” on 31 July 2026 and “live, HTTP 200” again on 2 September 2026.

At a glance — 1 hostname

foursigtics.comLookalike storefront — asset-level evidence · resolves but not serving — HTTP 522, when checked on 6 October 2026

0 of 1 were serving when we last checked it. A hostname's state can change on any day, in either direction — one row on this list was observed “does not resolve” on 31 July 2026 and “live, HTTP 200” again on 2 September 2026.

Where this stands today: the one hostname we document for Four Sigmatic was observed “resolves but not serving — HTTP 522” when we last checked it, on 6 October 2026. foursigtics.com — resolves but not serving — HTTP 522, when checked on 6 October 2026. Everything below is the dated record of what that address served on the dates we observed it — it does not claim it is up today. We did not observe why it stopped resolving, we make no claim that it was removed, suspended or taken down, and a hostname that stops resolving can be re-pointed at any time — one in this corpus already has.

Your brand · free counts first · $29 to reveal

How many lookalikes of your name are answering right now?

Free, no email and no card: we generate the lookalike and typosquat names for your domain, resolve them, fetch the ones that answer and grade them against your own page — then show you the counts, two of the rows in full, and the rest withheld. We generate the lookalike and typosquat names from your domain — different endings, hyphenated forms, single-character swaps and drops, and the shop / store / outlet / sale / official patterns our own documented corpus is full of. Only hostnames we confirm resolving are counted as resolving — a name nobody has registered is counted, never padded into a list.

Company nameYour real domainThe domain you actually own — we ask for it rather than guess, because an audit run against the wrong domain is the wrong report.

No email, no card, no account. The sweep runs live and usually takes under a minute.

Know what you need already? The $29 report is right here. The $29 report names every hostname behind these counts, with the dated readings for each, the copying evidence where we found it, a risk rating derived in code, our own published record where we already hold one — and the takedown request drafted for you to send.

Lookalike and typosquat candidates generated from your own domain — different endings, hyphenated forms, character swaps, drops and doublings, and the -shop/-outlet/-store/-sale/-official patterns our own documented corpus is full of
Every candidate resolved, and everything that resolves fetched live with cache bypassed — only hostnames we confirm resolving are listed, so a name nobody registered is counted rather than padded into your report
Per hostname: the date-stamped readings behind it — DNS, the HTTPS certificate served, the public registration record, and the page as served
Per hostname: a risk rating derived in code from what was observed, and the copying evidence where we found it — your own hosted files being served, your image filenames, your catalogue handles or part numbers, or your title wording reproduced
Where we already publish a dated record for a hostname, our own published finding, quoted verbatim
A ready-to-send takedown request with your details in square brackets, plus the dated evidence index it refers to
Delivered the moment the reads finish — the checks run live when you pay, so there is no research queue in front of it

What this is not: the Evidence Report is the researched tier — it adds the registrar and the true upstream host per domain, a filing drafted separately for every desk, and research beyond the patterns generated here. The audit is the deterministic sweep of your own name plus live reads, delivered without a research queue.

This is a point-in-time audit of publicly observable information, not legal advice and not monitoring. We assemble the evidence and draft the request; on this tier you send it. We do not file on your behalf, we do not contact the registrant, and no outcome or timeline is promised — that decision belongs to each registrar, host and platform.

Everything on this page is free to read, quote and take to a registrar, a marketplace or your own counsel. The audit above is the other question — what else is out there under your name that we have not documented — answered by a fresh sweep of your own domain, and one complete example is published in full.

The record: 1 documented hostname

Read each block as: the hostname we checked, the evidence class the finding rests on, the state we observed and the date we observed it, then every superseded observation and the artefacts we published, quoted exactly as we published them. Nothing here names a registrar, hosting provider, network or IP — that attribution is what the researched tiers are priced on, and it is withheld from every free page. We describe what each page serves; we make no assertion about any registrant’s intent or criminality, and nothing here is legal advice.

foursigtics.com

Evidence class: Lookalike storefront — asset-level evidence
Observed state: resolves but not serving — HTTP 522, when checked on 6 October 2026
Last observed serving: 17 August 2026 — the date the artefacts below belong to
First documented: 2026-08-17
Decay history (6 superseded observations): live, HTTP 200 on 17 August 2026
resolves but not serving — HTTP 403 on 2 September 2026
resolves but not serving — HTTP 403 on 8 September 2026
resolves but not serving — HTTP 403 on 15 September 2026
resolves but not serving — HTTP 403 on 22 September 2026
resolves but not serving — HTTP 403 on 29 September 2026
Artefacts we published (10): Four images on its homepage load from us.foursigmatic.com — the genuine Four Sigmatic store’s own domain. The page serves the genuine brand’s own hosted files, which is asset-level evidence.
us.foursigmatic.com/cdn/shop/files/Group_46562_1.png?v=1757339492
us.foursigmatic.com/cdn/shop/files/coffee-beans-background-free-png_c7f5d7fb-f33a-407e-ad68-1ba42cdb33ab.png?v=1743097849 — used twice on the page.
us.foursigmatic.com/cdn/shop/files/816897020195_Think_Organic_Coffee_with_Lions_Mane_Chaga_Mushrooms_Ground_Render_Front_19a5977f-9ebc-464e-9631-1cb358aecb0f.png?v=1743097854
The /cdn/shop/files/ path and the ?v= cache-busting stamps are a Shopify asset path, and the version stamps are the ones the genuine store generated.
On the same page the product photographs load from foursigtics.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/… — the suspect’s own server. The four images pointing back at the real brand were decorative: background artwork in one marketing section.
Its footer reads “Copyright © 2026 Four Sigmatic”.
Discounts in the 65–70% band: ground coffee marked $20 down to $6, and protein marked $50 down to $15 — both exactly 70% off.
A mushroom-coffee storefront carrying a slide for “JBuds Open Wireless Open-Ear Headphones” — a product the brand does not sell.
The support address published on the page is support@ its own domain — writing to it reaches whoever runs the page, not the brand being copied.

A server answering 403 or 404 is not a takedown: enforcement means a registry status code (clientHold or serverHold) read back off the domain’s record, and we have read none for this hostname. We record only the state we observed, on the day we observed it.

Full dated record for foursigtics.com →Paid it? The dispute route ($19 pack) →

What a row looks like as data

Every row above is published in the structured form our own sweeps write it — the same fixed state vocabulary, the same dated columns. The complete column schema, one row per documented hostname and the downloadable releases exactly as delivered are on the dataset page, free to read, quote and take to a registrar, a marketplace or your own counsel.

The record as data — the column schema and every documented row →

What this page is, and what it is not

It is a dated record. Every state above is what we observed on the day named beside it, in a fixed three-string vocabulary — nothing here is a statement about what any hostname is serving today, and we do not monitor these hostnames.
A hostname that went quiet has not been shown to have come down. We did not observe why it stopped answering, we make no claim that anything was removed, suspended or taken down, and a hostname can be re-pointed on any day.
It names no registrar, host, network or IP, and asserts nothing about any registrant's intent or about goods we have not examined.
It promises no outcome. Nothing here predicts or promises a takedown, a filing result or a timescale, and nothing here is legal advice.

Searches this page answers: “Four Sigmatic fake site” · “Four Sigmatic clone store” · “Four Sigmatic fake website list” · “Four Sigmatic counterfeit store” · “sites impersonating Four Sigmatic”

Other brands on the record

Every brand we have documented is on the record. Brands whose file carries more than one hostname, a published artefact, a self-check or a change of state keep a page like this one; the rest are listed with the same dated rows on the index. If you act for more than one, start here:

Glow Recipe High Country Gardens Jaxxon John Derian Company Keyway Designs Kimirica Kyte Baby Little Sleepies Lorena Canals Luxe Bites

See every documented hostname, listed by the brand it copies — or jump straight to Four Sigmatic's rows on the index. An index is a record of what we have checked, never a statement that nothing else exists.

If you have just found a copy of Four Sigmatic's store: what to do first · did my takedown actually work? · the ten-second own-CDN check · why a free scanner and our own check read one hostname differently

Scam Detective — pay-per-use scam intelligence. One-off checks, no subscription, no account.

Every finding here is an assessment of publicly available information at the time of the check, and is not legal advice. We produce the evidence and the correctly addressed request; on a Takedown Engagement we submit it to the abuse desks as the customer’s authorized agent, which is an administrative act and not legal representation. We do not monitor continuously and never contact the registrant on a customer’s behalf, and no outcome or timeline is guaranteed. Confirm your own trademark position before sending anything adversarial. Each hostname above carries the date its own finding was captured; the most recent check on this brand ran on 6 October 2026.

Are you Four Sigmatic, or do you act for them, and want a correction to any row above? scam-detective8@mail.acoco.ai